Display:


Can't you see how we were snookered (2.00 / 9)

She never had that super lead, that was just MSM conjecture and BS.


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sat May 17, 2008 at 09:19:24 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Can't you see how we were snookered (2.00 / 2)

Oh man. I'm going to be charitable and let you retract that. Kind of like a do-over in chess. Because that comment is about as divorced with reality as I've ever seen on this site.


by amiches on Sat May 17, 2008 at 09:21:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Here's my WORM (2.00 / 6)

I retract and renounce anything I may have said that was a misstatement or misunderstood by sensitive eyes and ears.


I didn't believe in god before the primaries and I still don't.
by NewHampster on Sat May 17, 2008 at 09:28:35 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Is this snark? (none / 0)

http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2 008/05/12/1011366.aspx

Please don't rewrite history. As late as Febuary 5th, she was leading in SDs 260 to 170. Obama didn't take the lead until less than a week ago.


should we go outside? / should we break some bread? / are you'nterested?
by Firewall on Sat May 17, 2008 at 09:21:56 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Can't you see how we were snookered (none / 0)

That's very interesting and I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter.  Do you have any source for that, or is that yet another of your insights that keep you up at night?


"I'm all for the delegate battle, and now that Obama's campaign is too, I'm all giddy. It's going to be the supers as kingmaker." J.Armstrong 01/19/08
by obscurant on Sat May 17, 2008 at 11:12:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]